Connect with us

Entertainment

WAEC 2025 WASSCE: Technical Glitches, Mass Failure, And The Future Of Exams In Nigeria

Published

on

WAEC 2025 WASSCE: Technical Glitches, Mass Failure, And The Future Of Exams In Nigeria

When the West African Examinations Council (WAEC) released the 2025 WASSCE results, many parents, teachers, and students were left in shock. Out of nearly two million candidates, only 38.32% passed with at least five credits, including English and Mathematics—a sharp decline from the 72% recorded in 2024.

What should have been a moment of academic celebration quickly spiraled into a national debate on the credibility of Nigeria’s education system.


WASSCE 2025: From Hope to National Disaster

WAEC initially celebrated the release of results on August 4, but the excitement didn’t last long. Parents and education stakeholders condemned the outcome, labeling it a “national disaster.”

  • Parents demanded the cancellation of affected papers, especially English and Mathematics.

  • Teachers accused WAEC of “bastardising” the education process through errors and poor exam management.

  • Students were left disillusioned, many shifting their hopes to NECO exams.


Technical Glitches and Exam Malpractice Concerns

WAEC later admitted that technical glitches affected results in Mathematics, English, Biology, and Economics, forcing the council to temporarily withdraw results before corrections were made.

But critics argue that blaming “technical glitches” is not enough. For example:

  • Some English Language papers allegedly leaked and were written at odd hours, leaving students emotionally drained.

  • Teachers and NANS (student body) described the exam conditions as chaotic and demoralizing.

  • Questions were raised about whether WAEC can realistically transition to full Computer-Based Testing (CBT) in 2026, given Nigeria’s poor digital infrastructure.


Stakeholders React: Who Is to Blame?

  • Nigeria Union of Teachers (NUT): Blamed systemic failure, saying exam conduct was flawed from the start.

  • NANS: Highlighted how mismanagement left students physically and emotionally exhausted.

  • Private School Teachers: Questioned WAEC’s credibility and warned that CBT exams could collapse if logistics are not improved.

  • Students: Some, like Blessing Uguru, blamed laziness among peers, while others accused WAEC of “toying with their future.”


Federal Government’s Position

Education Minister Dr. Maruf Olatunji Alausa defended ongoing reforms, highlighting progress in reducing malpractice:

  • 16.29% in 2023 → 11.92% in 2024 → 9.70% in 2025.

He insisted the government is committed to:

  • Teacher training to boost classroom quality.

  • Stronger anti-malpractice measures like serialization of question papers.

  • Transparency and accountability in examinations.


What This Means for Nigeria’s Education Future

The 2025 WASSCE outcome raises deeper questions:

  1. Can WAEC still be trusted as a credible examination body?

  2. Is Nigeria’s obsession with mass testing sustainable in a digital future?

  3. Are systemic failures in teaching, funding, and infrastructure the real culprits behind poor performance?

Unless WAEC and the Federal Government confront these issues head-on, Nigeria risks entrenching a broken education system that fails both teachers and students.


Conclusion: A Wake-Up Call for Reform

The 2025 WASSCE results should not just be seen as a mass failure—it’s a warning signal. Beyond technical glitches, this crisis reflects Nigeria’s wider education challenges: underfunded schools, poor exam management, and inadequate teacher support.

If left unaddressed, the credibility of WAEC—and Nigeria’s education system at large—will continue to decline. The future of millions of students depends on urgent reform.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crime

Death On Stream: The French Kick Scandal And The Dark Side Of Online Shock Content

Published

on

Death On Stream: The French Kick Scandal And The Dark Side Of Online Shock Content

The French Kick Scandal

The internet has always thrived on spectacle. From Jackass-style stunts to today’s TikTok challenges, audiences have long been drawn to the outrageous. But a recent incident in France has pushed that obsession with “extreme content” into deeply unsettling territory — a man died during a livestream on the Kick platform…..CONTINUE READING

Now, the streamer at the center of the storm, 23-year-old Safine Hamadi, is speaking out: “I’m not the one who killed him. None of us killed him.”

The victim, 46-year-old Raphael Graven (better known online as Jean Pormanove), collapsed during a 12-day nonstop broadcast that featured him enduring humiliation and physical challenges. At first glance, the footage seemed like a grim descent into digital exploitation. But Hamadi insists it was all scripted theater — nothing more than paid performance designed to grab clicks and go viral.


The Show That Went Too Far

According to Hamadi, he and Graven weren’t victims or perpetrators but “actors” earning €6,000 a month from the channel’s operator, Owen Cenazandotti. The shouting, the abuse, even Graven’s protests, Hamadi says, were staged for maximum shock value:

“We wanted it to be spectacular… so people would clip the videos, talk about us, create more buzz.”

This claim is partly backed up by prosecutors. An autopsy found no evidence of third-party violence, and Graven himself had previously told investigators he wasn’t being mistreated. On paper, it looks like a tragic death that happened during — not because of — a reckless broadcast.

But does that absolve anyone of responsibility?


Why France (and the World) Is Alarmed

The French government doesn’t think so. Officials announced legal action against Kick, accusing the platform of negligence and failing to protect users from dangerous content. Prosecutors in Paris have also opened a wider investigation into the company’s practices.

Kick, which is headquartered in Australia, hit back with accusations of “political opportunism.” But this fight is about more than one man’s death — it’s about the growing culture of dangerous online stunts, the platforms that host them, and the audiences that reward them.

Kick, often seen as a looser, edgier alternative to Twitch, has been accused before of letting creators push boundaries too far in pursuit of engagement. This incident could become a turning point, forcing regulators to clamp down harder on streaming platforms that thrive on viral chaos.


The Bigger Picture: When Views Trump Safety

What happened to Graven isn’t an isolated case. Around the world, content creators are upping the stakes to grab attention:

  • Eating dangerous amounts of food for “mukbang” streams.

  • Risking injuries in extreme sports challenges.

  • Performing risky pranks that blur the line between entertainment and abuse.

The brutal truth? Algorithms reward extremity. The more shocking the content, the higher the engagement. That creates a dangerous incentive structure where people — sometimes desperate for money, fame, or relevance — put themselves in harm’s way for likes.

Graven’s death forces us to ask: at what cost are we consuming entertainment?


Final Thoughts

Safine Hamadi may be right that he didn’t “kill” his colleague. But the livestreamed death of Raphael Graven is still a tragedy born of an attention economy that thrives on spectacle without boundaries.

The French government vs. Kick showdown isn’t just about one platform. It’s about where society draws the line between performance and exploitation, between entertainment and endangerment.

And until we have those conversations, one thing is clear: the internet will keep rewarding stunts that put human dignity — and sometimes human life — on the line.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Panic In BBNaija House As Imisi Discovers Alleged ‘Human Head’ In Fridge (Video)

Published

on

Panic In BBNaija House As Imisi Discovers Alleged ‘Human Head’ In Fridge (Video)

The Big Brother Naija (BBNaija) Season 10 house was thrown into a frenzy this week after housemate Imisi discovered what appeared to be a human head preserved in a clear jar inside the kitchen refrigerator. The shocking find sparked chaos among the contestants, leaving viewers and fans buzzing with questions about the authenticity of the discovery……CONTINUE READING

 

 

According to reports by Eyesjournals Imisi’s loud scream alerted other housemates, who quickly rushed to the kitchen to witness what she had found. The sight of the strange object sent ripples of fear across the house, with several contestants visibly shaken. Some speculated that it might be a prank orchestrated by Big Brother, while others expressed genuine fear, insisting that the object looked disturbingly real.

Face Your Fear Week

The discovery coincides with the show’s ongoing “Face Your Fear Week” — a challenge designed to test the bravery and emotional resilience of housemates. Over the years, reality television has often used psychological experiments and shock tactics to push contestants to their limits, and many fans believe this latest stunt could be part of that tradition.

Internationally, shows like Fear Factor (USA) and I’m a Celebrity… Get Me Out of Here! (UK/Australia) have long relied on fear-based tasks involving creepy or grotesque items. BBNaija appears to be adopting a similar formula to captivate audiences and keep the drama alive. However, the intensity of this season’s stunt has sparked debate about the ethical limits of reality TV.

Viewer Reactions

The incident quickly went viral on social media platforms including Twitter (X), Instagram, and TikTok, with hashtags like #BBNaija10, #Imisi, and #FaceYourFear trending across Nigeria and the diaspora. While some viewers laughed off the incident as creative entertainment, others criticized the producers, arguing that it could traumatize contestants.

One Twitter user wrote: “Big Brother has gone too far this time. Fear games are okay, but placing a human head in a fridge crosses a line. Real or fake, it’s disturbing.” Another countered: “This is why BBNaija is the king of African reality TV. Nobody knows what’s coming next!”

Ex-Housemate Gigi Speaks Out

In a related development, former Season 10 housemate Gigi Jasmine, who was recently evicted, weighed in on the drama. In an interview with Pulse Nigeria, she described her fellow contestants Faith and Imisi as “the most calculated players” in the house.

According to Gigi, Faith has a unique ability to read personalities and exploit weaknesses for strategic gain. “His ability to trigger reactions from housemates gave him an edge in the competition,” she said. On the other hand, she accused Imisi of staging her behavior for the cameras, suggesting that the fridge incident might have been exaggerated for attention. “She often puts up a fake character in the house. To me, her actions don’t always feel authentic,” Gigi added.

Her remarks have fueled debates among fans, some of whom agree with her analysis, while others argue that Imisi’s reaction was genuine given the shocking circumstances.

Broader Context of Reality TV

The use of props resembling human body parts is not new in global entertainment. For instance, Netflix’s Squid Game: The Challenge and older Japanese game shows have used hyper-realistic objects to create psychological tension. The key difference, however, is transparency: contestants usually expect the unexpected. In BBNaija’s case, the lack of clarity over whether the object was real or fake has left both housemates and viewers unsettled.

Media analysts suggest that stunts like this, while controversial, play a huge role in keeping viewership high. According to Statista, BBNaija remains one of the most-watched reality shows in Africa, drawing millions of viewers from Nigeria, Ghana, South Africa, and the wider diaspora. With sponsorships from multinational brands, the show has a vested interest in pushing boundaries to stay relevant in the competitive entertainment market.

What’s Next for the Housemates?

As of press time, Big Brother has not issued an official statement clarifying the nature of the fridge discovery. Fans are left wondering whether the show will provide answers during the next live eviction or whether the mystery will remain unresolved as part of the Face Your Fear challenge.

Psychologists, however, caution that repeated exposure to extreme shock tactics could impact contestants’ mental health. Dr. Chike Obi, a Nigerian psychologist specializing in media and behavior, noted in a BBC Africa interview on reality television: “The balance between entertainment and emotional safety is delicate. Producers must be careful not to cross into psychological harm.”

Conclusion

Whether real or staged, the discovery of a “human head” in the BBNaija house fridge has successfully reignited conversations about the extremes of reality television. It has kept fans glued to their screens and stirred debates far beyond Nigeria’s borders. As the season continues, one thing is certain — BBNaija remains a cultural phenomenon that thrives on unpredictability, shock, and drama.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Ayra Starr Claps Back At “Dancing With The Devil” Accusation After Roc Nation Deal

Published

on

Ayra Starr Claps Back At “Dancing With The Devil” Accusation After Roc Nation Deal

When it comes to superstition and conspiracy theories, Nigerian pop sensation Ayra Starr seems to attract her fair share. The Grammy-nominated singer, who recently inked a global management deal with Jay-Z’s Roc Nation, has now been accused by a social media user of “dancing with the devil” — and her reply was nothing short of iconic.

It all started after Ayra Starr took to X (formerly Twitter) to joke about her body changes. Posting pictures where her cleavage was more pronounced, she wrote:

“Really dnt knw hw to act with these new tiddiesss.”

For most fans, it was just Ayra being playful and carefree. But one American woman decided to turn it into something darker. The woman claimed Ayra’s reference to her body was tied to her Roc Nation deal, insisting that “One thing about working with Jay-Z, you gotta dance with the devil baby… literally.”

Without missing a beat, Ayra Starr fired back with a sharp response:

“Back to sender babyyyy.”

Why the Backlash?

Ayra Starr, like many African artists who break into global markets, has been targeted by conspiracy theories linking fame to occult practices. Ever since she signed her five-year Roc Nation contract, social media has been buzzing with rumours — from wild claims that she “sold her soul” to restrictions on her personal life, including an alleged ban on dating or starting a family during her contract.

Ayra has already dismissed those rumours, making it clear she’s focused on her career and music, not on the noise. Still, it reflects a recurring theme in the entertainment industry: when artists, especially women, achieve success quickly, critics often search for sinister explanations instead of acknowledging their talent and hard work.

The Bigger Picture

This episode also highlights the double standards women in music face. While male artists can brag about wealth, lifestyle, or even their bodies without scrutiny, women are often policed for self-expression. Ayra’s playful comment about her breasts suddenly became a “spiritual debate,” showing how society tends to sexualize, judge, or demonize women for things men easily get away with.

Final Thoughts

Ayra Starr’s rise has been meteoric, and with her Roc Nation backing, she’s poised for even greater global dominance. But as her response shows, she’s not just talented — she’s witty, fearless, and refuses to let baseless accusations distract her.

At the end of the day, her clapback — “Back to sender babyyyy” — is more than just a reply. It’s a message to critics everywhere: she’s not here for the drama; she’s here to shine.

Continue Reading

Trending